A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their family members house. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are subject to rigorous controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to Get visual evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of actions had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected intimately because of the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important minute during the lawful timeline.
With the Main in the dispute is a disagreement about boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling files, maps, and problems hooked up into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is inspired by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Unique Area of Conservation and say that each one performs are carried out according to Experienced advice and permitted programs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, do not change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced previously been linked to community advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays unsure. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay alongside one another very long following the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most René Collier closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.